Validation of the Portuguese version of the Telework Benefits and Disadvantages Scale

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2026.12.1.451

Keywords:

Telework, Psychometrics, Confirmatory factor analysis, Validity

Abstract

Background and objective: Telework has grown significantly, yet gaps remain in assessing benefits and drawbacks. The lack of validated instruments limits the understanding of how remote work impacts workers’ well-being and satisfaction. This study aimed to validate the Portuguese version of the Remote Working Benefits and Disadvantages Scale (RW-B&D). Method: One hundred and thirty-three workers were assessed, with a mean age of 36.79 years (SD = 10.35). Content validity was examined by experts. The two-factor structure was tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach’s alpha. Construct validity was explored through correlations with measures of satisfaction, work–life balance, and psychological health indicators. Results: The RW-B&D showed excellent comprehensibility. CFA supported the adequacy of the two-factor model (CFI = 0.97; TLI = 0.96; RMSEA = 0.06; SRMR = 0.08). Internal consistency was high (Benefits: α = 0.91; Drawbacks: α = 0.86). Perceived drawbacks were associated with lower telework satisfaction and poorer work–life balance, as well as higher levels of tiredness/exhaustion, negative affect, anxiety, fatigue, techno-skepticism, and inefficacy. Perceived benefits were associated with higher satisfaction and better work–life balance, and with lower levels of techno-skepticism and fatigue. Conclusions: The Portuguese version of the RW-B&D demonstrated adequate psychometric properties for assessing perceptions of telework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, T., Golden, T., & Shockley, K. (2015a). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://sl1nk.com/qWYFR

Breaugh, J. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38(6), 551–570. https://sl1nk.com/PZb3e

Carochinho, J. A. (2018). Adaptação e validação para a língua Portuguesa de um conjunto de escalas de bem-estar. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicologica, 46(1), 37–50. https://l1nq.com/MjyuO

Ceribeli, H., & Mignacca, T. (2019). Uma análise da influência da flexibilização do trabalho sobre a satisfação do trabalhador e o comportamento de cidadania organizacional. GESTÃO.Org - Revista Eletrônica de Gestão Organizacional, 17(1), 88–104. https://l1nq.com/jlm2S

Chaves, C., Duarte, J., Nelas, P., Coutinho, E., Cruz, C., & Dionisio, R. (2019). O tecnostress em profissionais de saúde nos cuidados de saúde primários. Revista INFAD de Psicología - International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 1(2), 297–304. https://sl1nk.com/RTUVY

Cid, M. (2021). Os efeitos do teletrabalho no equilíbrio entre a vida pessoal e profissional [Dissertação de mestrado]. Instituto Universitário de Lisboa. https://sl1nk.com/SmBKR

Dutcher, G. (2012). Os efeitos do teletrabalho na produtividade: Uma análise experimental. O papel das tarefas monótonas e criativas. Revista de Comportamento Econômico e Organização, 84(1), 355–363. https://shorturl.at/Qalk5

Espirito Santo, H., & Daniel, F. B. (2015). Calcular e apresentar tamanhos do efeito em trabalhos científicos (1): As limitações do p < 0,05 na análise de diferenças de médias de dois grupos. Revista Portuguesa de Investigação Comportamental e Social, 1(1), 3–16. https://l1nq.com/xkMbz

Espirito Santo, H., & Daniel, F. (2018). Calcular e apresentar tamanhos do efeito em trabalhos científicos (3): Guia para reportar os tamanhos do efeito para análises de regressão e ANOVAs. Revista Portuguesa de Investigação Comportamental e Social, 4(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/f92f

European Social Partners. (2002). Framework agreement on telework (16 July 2002). European Commission DG Employment and Social Affairs. https://shorturl.at/x0XUj

Faustino, D., Sousa, M., Gonçalves, M. M., Soares, I., & Tiago Oliveira, J. (2023). Perceção do impacto do teletrabalho na carreira: Validação da escala do impacto do teletrabalho na carreira para a população portuguesa. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 1(67), 5–17. https://sl1nk.com/PEZFi

Gajendran, R., & Harrison, D. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://shre.ink/qhAZ

Gomes, M. I. (2023). Sustentabilidade, empregabilidade e teletrabalho. In Congresso Luso-Brasileiro de Direito e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 47–56. Braga, Portugal: Escola de Direito da Universidade do Minho. https://sl1nk.com/mPYEo

Hair, J., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (2004). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. In Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment (1st ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://l1nq.com/xpuKK

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/dbt

Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Cortese, C. G., Molino, M., Pasca, P., & Ciavolino, E. (2023). Development and validation of the Remote Working Benefits and Disadvantages Scale. Quality & Quantity, 57(2), 1159–1183. https://l1nq.com/EhdML

Instituto Nacional de Estatística. (2023). Destaque: Rendimento e condições de vida (Vol. 2014).

International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). https://sl1nk.com/sX25y

Kline, R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3.ª ed.). Guilford Press.

Kossek, E., & Lautsch, B. (2008). CEO of me: Creating a life that works in the flexible job age. Pearson Prentice Hall.

Lapa, T., Vieira, J., Azevedo, J., & Cardoso, G. (2018). As desigualdades digitais e a sociedade portuguesa: Divisão, continuidades e mudança. https://l1nq.com/sibC4

Li, C. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936-949. https://doi.org/f83h6m

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), Artigo 382. https://l1nq.com/92InR

Mann, S., & Holdsworth, L. (2003). The psychological impact of teleworking: Stress, emotions and health. New Technology, Work and Employment, 18(3), 196–211. https://l1nq.com/r2zOn

Mateus, C. (2023, October 25). Estudo indica que dois terços dos portugueses estão descontentes com o salário e mais de metade “chumbam” modelo de trabalho. Expresso. https://l1nq.com/Owvir

Mehrolia, S., Alagarsamy, S., & Balachandran, A. (2021). Work from home in the pandemic era: Loss of mental equilibrium? In Asian Journal of Psychiatry (Vol. 55, p. 102490). https://l1nq.com/HHImq

Melin, M., Astvik, W., & Oettel, C. (2014). New work demands in higher education: A study of the relationship between excessive workload, coping strategies and subsequent health among academic staff. Quality in Higher Education, 20(3), 290–308. https://sl1nk.com/EZygy

Nakrošienė, A., Bučiūnienė, I., & Goštautaitė, B. (2019). Working from home: Characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower, 40(1), 87–101. https://l1nq.com/XinBt

Pinheiro, R., & Lima, F. (2022). O que sabemos sobre os efeitos do teletrabalho? Considerações desde a Psicologia. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 22(3). https://l1nq.com/e1bU8

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://sl1nk.com/X8IU9

Quintal, A. (2002). O teletrabalho: O conceito e implicações. Universidade de Coimbra.

Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., & Nogareda, C. (2007). “El ‘tecnoestrés’: Concepto, medida e intervención psicosocial.” Nota Técnica de Prevención (730).

Silva, G. (2018). Teletrabalho: Nova configuração de trabalho flexível e possíveis efeitos à subjetividade e saúde mental dos teletrabalhadores. Revista Espaço Acadêmico, 18(209), 44–55. https://sl1nk.com/VXngm

Simões, A. (1993). São os homens mais agressivos que as mulheres? Revista Portuguesa de Pedagogia, 27(3), 387–404.

Sirigatti, S., Stefanile, C., & Menoni, E. (1988). Per un adattamento italiano del Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 187-188, 33–39. https://l1nq.com/xbtXv

Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. https://sl1nk.com/R9T69

Ware, J., & Gandek, B. (1998). Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: The IQOLA Project approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 945–952. https://shorturl.at/IYFzJ

Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://shorturl.at/Qmwgp

Zhang, S., Moeckel, R., Moreno, A., Shuai, B., & Gao, J. (2020). A work-life conflict perspective on telework. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 141, 51–68. https://shorturl.at/WNKsc

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Lemos, L., Sousa, R., Azedo, D., Andrade, A., Bento Nogueira, F., Carreiras, D., & Tavares, F. (2025). Validation of the Portuguese version of the Telework Benefits and Disadvantages Scale. Portuguese Journal of Behavioral and Social Research, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2026.12.1.451

Issue

Section

Original Paper

Most read articles by the same author(s)