Training and reinforcement of competencies in chronic kidney disease hemodialysis patients - The Program “Believe+ and keep going“: Preliminary results

Authors

  • Marta Freitas Olim Diaverum, Sintra, Portugal
  • Luis Carrasco Diaverum, Amadora, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7835-5296
  • Joana Pimenta Diaverum, Sintra, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7617-7270
  • Filipa Silva Diaverum, Estoril, Portugal
  • Susana Torres Diaverum, Aveiro, Portugal
  • Joana Dantas Diaverum, Régua, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7342/ismt.rpics.2017.3.2.56

Keywords:

Social Works with Groups, Chronic Kidney Disease, Hemodialysis, Occupation

Abstract

Background & Objective: This study presents preliminary results and describes the structure of a training and skills development project, based on a group Social Service methodology and on the needs of chronic kidney patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment. The goal was to promote the acceptance of the disease and its related treatment, in a positive way, and the promotion of healthy living habits with a favorable impact on life project, namely in the current state of their occupation. Participants: Thirty people participated voluntarily (16 men and 14 women), aged 26 years and 77 years (M = 49.6; SD ± 14.88), without any type of occupation. Procedures: There were 4 editions in different regions of Portugal. Each edition had a heterogeneous group of 7-10 chronic kidney patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment at a given outpatient clinic. Each edition included 6 sessions, twice a week. It was assessed both the level of participation and adherence to the project throughout the sessions, as well as the effectiveness of changing the post-project occupational situation. To measure these variables, it was monitored the adherence to the occupational response at baseline, and during a period of one year. Results: At the end of this preliminary phase of the project, 50% of participants integrated occupational response. There was a total adherence of the participants to the sessions in an active and continuous way, and there were no withdrawals. Training was the occupational response with the largest number of adherence, about 27% of the participants, when compared to the other alternatives such as employment, volunteering, or structured and frequent physical activity. Conclusion: This project emphasizes occupation as a primary factor in the clinical rehabilitation and social reintegration of this population in the society, with clear psychosocial benefits for the participants and introducing new challenges to the practice of Social Work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almeida, J. M. C. (1985). A adaptação do Insuficiente renal crónico à hemodiálise: Estudo da influência da personalidade e das matrizes familiar, sociocultural e terapêutica [The adaptation of the chronic renal insufficiency patient to the Hemodialysis: Study of the influence of the personality and of the familiar, sociocultural, and therapeutic matrices] (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Faculdade de Ciências de Lisboa, Lisboa. [Google Scholar]

Cohen, S. D., Sharma, T., Acquaviva, K., Peterson, R. A., Patel, S. S., & Kimmel, P. L. (2007). Social support and chronic kidney disease: An update. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease, 14(4), 335-344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Cukor, D., Coplan, J., Brown, C., Peterson, R. A., & Kimmel, P. L. (2008). Course of depression and anxiety diagnosis in patients treated with hemodialysis: A 16-month follow-up. Clinical Journal of the America of Society Nephrology, 3(6), 1752-1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Curtin, R. B., Oberley, E. T., Sacksteder, P., & Friedman, A. (1996). Differences between employed and nonemployed dialysis patients. American Journal of Kidney Disease, 27(4), 533-540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Heiwe, S., Clyne, N., & Dahlgren, M. A. (2003). Living with chronic renal failure: Patients experiences of their physical and functional capacity. Physiotherapy Research International, 8(4), 167-177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Johnson, B., & Corte-Real, F. (2000). O som do silêncio: Uma reflexão a partir do serviço social da saúde em hospital [The sound of silence: A reflection from the social service of health in a hospital. Intervenção Social, 2000(21), 33-44. [Google Scholar] [URL]

Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1990). Stress, productivity and reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books. [Google Scholar]

Lume, J. (1986). Comportamento humano em situação artificial de vida: Um trabalho de investigação em hemodiálise renal [Human behavior in artificial life situation: A research work on kidney dialysis] (Doctoral dissertation, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto). [Handle]

Macário, F. (2016). Relatório do Gabinete de Registo da SPN – Tratamento substitutivo renal da doença renal crónica estadio V em Portugal [Report of the Registry Office of the Portuguese Society of Nephrology - Renal replacement therapy for chronic stage V renal disease in Portugal]. Report presented at the Encontro renal 2017. [Google Scholar] [PDF]

McCool, M., Johnstone, S., Sledge, R., Witten, B., Contillo, M., Aebel-Groesch, K., & Hafner, J. (2011). The promise of symptom-targeted intervention to manage depression in dialysis patients. Nephrology News & Issues, 25(6), 32-37. [Google Scholar]

Muehrer, R. J., Schatell, D., Witten, B., Gangnon, R., Becker, B. N., & Hofmann, R. M. (2011). Factors affecting employment at initiation of dialysis. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 6(3), 489-496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Organização Mundial de Saúde. (2016). Chronic diseases and their common risk factors. Genebra: WHO. [Google Scholar] [URL]

Olim, M. S. M. F. P. (2012). O desafio do modelo sistémico na doença renal crónica em contexto hospitalar [The challenge of the systemic model in chronic kidney disease in hospital context]. Revista Mosaico, 51(1), 5-9.

Olim, M. S. M. F. P. (2013). O impacto da doença renal cronica nas dinâmicas familiares do paciente [The impact of chronic kidney disease on the patient's family dynamics] (Master´s thesis, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisboa). [Handle]

Rolland, J. S., & Williams, J. K. (2005). Toward a biopsychosocial model for 21st-century genetics. Family Process, 44(1), 3-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Untas, A., Thumma, J., Rascle, N., Rayner, H., Mapes, D., Lopes, A. A., . . . Combe, C. (2011). The associations of social support and other psychosocial factors with mortality and quality of life in the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 6(1), 142-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Published

2017-09-29

How to Cite

Freitas Olim, M., Carrasco, L., Pimenta, J., Silva, F., Torres, S., & Dantas, J. (2017). Training and reinforcement of competencies in chronic kidney disease hemodialysis patients - The Program “Believe+ and keep going“: Preliminary results. Portuguese Journal of Behavioral and Social Research, 3(2), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.7342/ismt.rpics.2017.3.2.56

Issue

Section

Original Paper