Speed as an indicator of response effort in human behavior: A brief report

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2025.11.2.396

Keywords:

Response Effort, Physical Response effort, Physical effort, Psychomotor performance, Human behavior, Behavioral interventions

Abstract

Background: Response effort is a central dimension in behavior analysis and can modulate responding in contexts related to safety, health, and sustainability. Although response effort has been extensively studied through manipulations of ratio and force requirements, little is known about the effects of response speed. Objective: To examine the effects of different speed requirements, as manipulations of response effort, on human response rates. Method: Six undergraduate students participated in an A–B–A single-case design using a computer-based task involving the destruction of “pollution sources,” under a multiple variable-interval schedule (VI 15s / VI 30s). The speed requirement (20%, 40%, 80%, or 100% of screen length per second) varied across sessions and returned to the initial value in the final phase. Results: In general, increases in the speed requirement were accompanied by reductions in response rates, with no consistent effects of reinforcement rate between components. Asymmetrical patterns between groups exposed to increasing versus decreasing speed, as well as individual differences, suggested variability in sensitivity to effort. Conclusions: The findings suggest that speed functions as a dimension of response effort with predominantly suppressive effects on responding, offering an additional parameter that may be useful in nonpunitive behavioral interventions in clinical, educational, and organizational contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alling, K., & Poling, A. (1995). The effects of differing response-force requirements on fixed-ratio responding of rats. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63(3), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1995.63-331

Brothers, K. J., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1994). Office paper recycling: A function of container proximity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1994.27-153

Capehart, J., Viney, W., & Hulicka, I. M. (1958). The effect of effort upon extinction. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 51(4), 505–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045753

Chung, S.-H. (1965). Effects of effort on response rate. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 8(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1965.8-1

Critchfield, T. S., & Rasmussen, E. R. (2007). It’s aversive to have an incomplete science of behavior. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 33(Número extraordinário 1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v33.i0.16270

Elsmore, T. F. (1971). Effects of response effort on discrimination performance. The Psychological Record, 21(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393984

Elsmore, T. F., & Brownstein, A. J. (1968). Effort and response rate. Psychonomic Science, 10(9), 313–314. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03331536

Fontes, R. M., & Shahan, T. A. (2021). Punishment and its putative fallout: A reappraisal. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 115(1), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.653

Friman, P. C., Finney, J. W., Rapoff, M. A., & Christophersen, E. R. (1985). Improving pediatric appointment keeping with reminders and reduced response requirement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18(4), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1985.18-315

Friman, P. C., Glasscock, S. G., Finney, J. W., & Christophersen, E. R. (1987). Reducing effort with reminders and a parking pass to improve appointment keeping for patients of pediatric residents. Medical Care, 25(1), 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198701000-00010

Friman, P. C., & Poling, A. (1995). Making life easier with effort: Basic findings and applied research on response effort. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28(4), 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1995.28-583

Gage, N. A., & Lewis, T. J. (2013). Analysis of effect for single-case design research. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2012.660673

Gwinn, M. M., Derby, K. M., Fisher, W., Kurtz, P., Fahs, A., Augustine, M., & McLaughlin, T. F. (2005). Effects of increased response effort and reinforcer delay on choice and aberrant behavior. Behavior Modification, 29(4), 642–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445503259489

Irvin, D. S., Thompson, T. J., Turner, W. D., & Williams, D. E. (1998). Utilizing increased response effort to reduce chronic hand mouthing. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(3), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1998.31-375

Johnson, N., & Viney, W. (1970). Resistance to extinction as a function of effort. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 71(1), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028980

Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2.ª ed.). Oxford University Press.

Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/ReferenceResources/wwc_scd.pdf

Luiz, A., Costa, C. E., dos Santos, J. R., & Tsutsumi, M. M. A. (2020). Resistance to change as function of different physical-effort requirements in humans. Behavioural Processes, 176, Artigo 104123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104123

Luiz, A., Costa, C. E., Banaco, R. A., & Tsutsumi, M. M. A. (2022). Effects of different physical-effort requirements on resistance to extinction in humans. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 23(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2021.1932344

Miller, L. K. (1968). Escape from an effortful situation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11(5), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1968.11-619

Mowrer, O. H., & Jones, H. M. (1943). Extinction and behavior variability as functions of effortfulness of task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(5), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056182

Nevin, J. A., & Grace, R. C. (2000). Behavioral momentum and the law of effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00002405

Pinkston, J. W., & Foss, E. K. (2018). The role of response force on the persistence and structure of behavior during extinction. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 109(1), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.306

Pinkston, J. W., & Libman, B. M. (2017). Aversive functions of response effort: Fact or artifact? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 108(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.264

Powell, R. W. (1968). The effect of small sequential changes in fixed-ratio size upon the post-reinforcement pause. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11(5), 589–593. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1968.11-589

Sidman, M. (2000). Coercion and its fallout (Ed. rev.). Authors Cooperative. (Trabalho original publicado em 1989)

Skinner, B. F. (1965). Science and human behavior. Free Press. (Trabalho original publicado em 1953)

Skinner, B. F., & Morse, W. H. (1958). Fixed-interval reinforcement of running in a wheel. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1(4), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1958.1-371

Soares, P. G., Costa, C. E., Aló, R. M., Luiz, A., & Cunha, T. R. de L. (2017). Custo da resposta: Como tem sido definido e estudado? Perspectivas em Análise do Comportamento, 8(2), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.18761/PAC.2017.020

Solomon, R. L. (1948). Effort and extinction rate: A confirmation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 41(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057127

Van Camp, C. M., Vollmer, T. R., & Daniel, D. (2001). A systematic evaluation of stimulus preference, response effort, and stimulus control in the treatment of automatically reinforced self-injury. Behavior Therapy, 32(3), 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(01)80037-X

Weiner, H. (1966). Preference and switching under ratio contingencies with humans. Psychological Reports, 18(1), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1966.18.1.239

Wilder, D. A., Ertel, H. M., & Cymbal, D. J. (2021). A review of recent research on the manipulation of response effort in applied behavior analysis. Behavior Modification, 45(5), 740–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445520908509

Winograd, E. (1965). Escape behavior under different fixed ratios and shock intensities. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 8(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1965.8-117

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Connor de Méo Luiz, A., Ayres Tsutsumi, M. M., Martins da Silva Neto, J., Rocker dos Santos, J., Mussett Lazaniri, K. de K., Andrade de Lemos, L. H., & Tresso Terrin, R. (2025). Speed as an indicator of response effort in human behavior: A brief report. Portuguese Journal of Behavioral and Social Research, 11(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2025.11.2.396

Issue

Section

Original Paper

Most read articles by the same author(s)